“Tech FI” is easier on multiple counts. Not only is the salary high, but being paid 2-3x median income makes it a lot easier to blend in with the rest of society. Techers can still have their house and their cars... live a normal lifestyle with normal means, and still manage a 50% or higher SR. A dual income household can achieve early FI while living a similar lifestyle as their high-income peers. It’s a twofer where there is no psychological challenge or stigma since one is not living below the median as with archetypical ERE, and spending is at a high enough level that frugal skills are completely optional.
Furthermore, tech jobs tend to be “not so bad” in terms of working conditions and the nature of the work itself. So, I just want to express my understanding and respect for those who don’t have this good fortune and need to grind it out at jobs that are either low-paying and/or uninteresting.
Hang in there THF. From my vantage point you are much too focused on FI/RE as a goal when it is best achieved as a side effect of a frugal, productive lifestyle. I realize you are eager to join the 6-figure NW club

but try to be content with the progress you have already made. You have 6+ years of expenses saved up. It’s not FI, but with your spending efficiency it is solidly FU.
Rationally, I think you should be “feeling abundant” with your level of NW. But from personal experience, I think I can empathize. When I started out in 2014, MMM-FI (600k + paid off house) was my goal. When that happened in 2016, there was a remarkable and rather instantaneous switch from a feeling of financial scarcity to abundance. And even though I still can’t RE currently, I’m still mentally anchored to that 600k number and there hasn’t been any goal creep whatsoever. Of course, I’m still accumulating, and I continue to keep score. But in my mind and my heart, I have enough and I’m at peace. The whole point of this is, maybe once you reach your goal whether it is 100k or 3% SWR or whatever, your financial insecurities will go away.
Also +1 to @jennypenny’s suggestion of taking some risks and allowing yourself to make mistakes in your 20s. Don’t get caught up in trying to
create the perfect ERE life. You won’t be judged for failing to achieve FI by 25 or even 30. Life satisfaction is the measure of success, not net worth or retirement.
Going to be blunt here, but I don’t really understand your strategy with grad school. As an outside observer, I don’t get the sense that you know yourself or the potential career/job market well enough to ensure it won’t be a complete waste of time/$$$. I hope you will prove me wrong.
TopHatFox wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 2:01 am
I don't think I'll be going to a Columbia or NYU this time around since fin aid for grad school is much less.
If it were me, I would apply to prestige schools and do the master’s as a full-time student. If you work as a teaching or research assistant it’s not uncommon to get a tuition waiver + a stipend in the $25-30k+ range.(*) Or you can get a fellowship through programs such as the NSF or NDSEG. When I was in grad school I had money shoved at me from every which direction. Though it does help to study something which is in demand (hint, hint)
(*) There’s a lot more synergy doing this than say, working a 40k full-time job to cashflow your part-time master’s degree. And if you can’t get paid to go to grad school, then maybe you should be doing something else instead?
Best of luck. Eagerly awaiting the next installment of “Fox news”.