@delay thanks! I doubt you'd nod off that soon - motorcycling has a way of gripping your attention.
--
I realized that I've slowed down the volume of my forum posting and engagement recently because I have a flinch response whenever I contemplate engaging with deeper topics. My brain locks on to misunderstandings and has a very hard time letting them go, and I find myself spending far more cognitive energy attempting to understand the misunderstanding than I'm okay with.
I also think I get lost in the misunderstandings and it causes ME to begin to misunderstand the issue, partly because I don't firewall my simulations of other people's perspectives good enough and their misunderstanding oozes into *my* model. In the process of simulating their perspective I'll temporarily adopt their assumptions, but then when I shut down the simulation some of those assumptions stick around and it corrupts my original perspective. This is embarrassing, to put it mildly.
I'm increasing my understanding of how little I understand about anything. I discover myself being wrong about things all the time, things I was *really sure* I was right about (I was having a discussion about ere2 with my MMG, and then went back and read some of the threads and realized my model of ERE2 had drifted significantly since I'd dug in to it last). I'm having a self-censoring "stfu noob/lurk more" reaction to this feeling.
(Related topic: if 8 neurotypical people play telephone, the message doesn't get garbled. If 8 autistic people play telephone, the message doesn't get garbled. If 8 mixed neurotypes play telephone, the message gets garbled.
Source. Anyway, the double empathy issue combined with the traits that make me a high masker might have something to do with why I find 'being misunderstood' to be both an excruciating and common experience.)
I do feel like I've done a lot of self-discovery in the past few months as a result of working with the hypothesis that I'm working with atypical brain wiring (as contrasted with my previous theory, which was that I kinda sucked and had to work real hard to get up to baseline function), and I'm still working out authentic preferences.
There are a lot of things I've done because I thought that the pain or effort it took me was just a result of me sucking at it, and if I just worked hard enough to get good at it, then I'd like it like everyone else. I was right about this for some things! But it didn't really occur to me that sometimes the reason it was effortful or painful is because I just didn't like it and wasn't wired to like it, unlike 99% of everyone else, and it was actually okay for me to just not. Conversely with things I enjoy or tolerate that 99% of people find painful, effortful, or disturbing, and it was okay for me to *do* those things without having to think up some elaborate justification for it. "Because I like it, PS fuck you <3" is a perfectly adequate answer, it turns out.
I've spent a lot of time beating my sense of self into a certain kind of shape, I'm realizing, and I had no conscious idea that I was doing it. Or rather, I thought what I was doing was self-improvement. In many ways I was. But I was also doing self-sculpting based off of references and copies of other people who were not built the same way I was (because I didn't have a good understanding of how I was built and didn't know how to filter my references for compatible neurotypes/behaviors/preferences).
It occurs to me that there might be no other way to do this. The steps I'm reflecting on might all be required. How else to discover who you are then to make a change, engage with the world, observe the effects and sensations that arise, update the model of self, make another change, and try again? What I'm experienced might be something like a meso-cycle. I did a lot of cycles of self-improvement under the framework of my previous understanding of self, and then I had an event that caused me to make a very large update to my understanding of self, lots of deletions of old assumptions and rewriting new ideas, and now I'm in a new mesocycle of personal growth/development.
I'm not sure if I'm in a vertical "need more theory integration" phase or a "work on implementation and skills" phase, or perhaps transitioning from one to the other and that's why I feel sort of out of sync. I suspect I just had a vertical theory update (in terms of self understanding, not WLs) and am at the *very* beginning of a horizontal practice phase, and it's a disconcerting place to be.
*Some of the preferences I'm examining:
-Wait, do I even *like* hanging out with [a whole list of people]?
-Wait, do I even *like* hanging out with [a few different categories of people]?
-Wait, do I even *want* to live closer than 1 mile to more than 1 or two other very special people for longer than a week at a time? (e.g. examining my desire/interest in intentional communities)
-Wait, do I even *like* to travel? (I've already concluded that there are several methods of travel that I very much don't like and won't be doing again).
-Wait, why do I bend over backward to make people I'm in conversations with not feel uncomfortable or stupid? (Been having fun experimenting with withholding the kid-glove treatment on this one...)
-Wait, can I just, like, be an asshole, sometimes? And the sky won't fall? And maybe it'll be kind of fun?
-Wait, do I even want to spend one more minute of my life doing [a whole list of activities].
ETA I'm finding
Dabrowski's theory of personal disintegration extremely interesting and resonant (Jacob mentioned him in JnGs journal).
1.3 Brief overview of the theory.
⚂ 1.3.1 Dabrowski believed that socialization curtails individual growth.
≻ Mental health involves more than merely adopting and adapting to societal norms or expectations.
≻ Instead, mental health emphasizes self-transformation in creating and pursuing higher ideals that shape a unique, authentic, and autonomous personality.
≻ Disintegrating the initial socialized psychological structures is necessary to create opportunities for the individual to take growth into their own hands.
≻ Lower structures are replaced by integrations into new, higher structures.
≻ Higher structures are consciously chosen to reflect the values and essence of the individual.
≻ At the highest level, a unique and autonomous personality comes to guide behaviour.
≻ Disintegration requires a constellation of factors Dąbrowski called developmental potential.