Alphaville wrote: ↑Tue May 11, 2021 6:16 am
i guess the part that always grates me about this approach is the implication embedded in this sort of sentence:
- all women understand each other
- women and men can't understand each other
i am so tired of the men from mars women from venus shit im ready to puke the breakfast i haven't even eaten yet.
I think both you and WB7 can be right at the same time.
Women and men are socialized differently, based off of how they were born (their sex). In that way, I believe gender is explicitly tied to sex, which may have people come after me with pitch forks. It is a magnified reality of sexed differences that has developed likely since we were ape.
The question is, is gender innate to a human?
I would say no, it is a cultural construct that MAY have been useful at one point. There are differences in reality for men and women, such as: women are usually weaker, women give birth, and women have periods. These make women have a shared reality--this reality was then mestatized by culture and expanded (hmm could simulacra be used in this context? haven't read the book, don't know).
So for instance, setting aside women and men, if one half of a species is weaker than the other half, the weaker half may learn to be more subversive, more agreeable, and more appeasing to -get what they want without having strength and to -prevent violence against them. I want us to look beyond men and women, because if it just so happened that men were born weaker, then I believe they would be socialized in the same way.
Similarly, men may have a slight difference in how they respond to stressors and desires due to increased testosterone, however, I believe that the impact of this testosterone is magnified to nth degree by socialization. For instance, a women who experiences increased testosterone would probably be more likely to cry out of frustration or keep it to herself until she breaks down where a man might, on the healthy side--take direct action immediately and aggressively or, on the unhealthy side--punch a hole in the wall or worse.
At this current point and time, it is true that women would understand other women more because women all live within the reality of how they were socialized. The question is--is this socialization natural and/or is it worth it?
I am often disowned from radical feminist groups for stating that it may have been natural and even needed in the past. With technological advancements, women's liberation, etc--I do not think it is needed, and I think it is harmful. Women's weakness is mostly irrelevant in most jobs, the advancement of birth control, abortion, etc means that women are not tied to the physical reality role of motherhood unless they so choose (at least in progressive countries/cultures)... etc.
I believe the recent backlash from men (incels and rising violence towards women) is specifically because women are no longer stuck in social role of wife (designated sex-doll ((not saying that's what wife is, but it was in the past. Remember marital rape has only become illegal verrry recently) and/or mother.
Anyways, this is just to say that I think there is more nuance than both "Men and women are vastly different--feminine is chaos UWU jordan peterson vomit" and "Men and women are exactly the same"
Physical reality is experienced differently, culture magnifies these differences which equals: Gendered constructs. Given every women is raised with gendered constructs that are very strict in nature, they may be able to understand each other more when it comes to certain aspects. The radical feminist goal is to get women to think outside of gendered constructs. Further technology may be able to obliterate them altogether, but it will take generations.
As far as the answer to men and their socialization, I don't know and i don't care. Men need to figure that out for themselves and it is not women's job although many feminists think it is. Women have enough of their own shit to unlearn. Toxic masculinity is not the responsibility nor fault of women, in fact, women are most often the victims of it. The fact that men are victims too is irrelevant to women. Uh oh, I feel myself going on a rant. That's for another day.
Erm... did any of that make sense.