those other parts of the causal chain that brute has mentioned above:
it's getting warm
-> that's bad
-> it can be prevented
-> preventing it is better than adapting to it
-> the humans who run the post office should be in charge of it
brute is relatively on board with the whole physics part of climate change. brief disclaimer on the "relatively": brute is no physicist, and has no way of verifying any of the information touted by "experts" on his own. brute has been burned by "experts" before, in fields that were more easily verifiable than climate physics. thus, brute trusts the climate physics experts only to a certain degree, just as he trusts any experts only to a certain degree if he can't verify on his own.
i.e. if, should brute be alive in 50 years, the climate predictions have come true, he would not be very surprised. after all, it was what the experts predicted. should they not have come true, brute would also not be very surprised - experts make wrong predictions all the time, as mentioned by DLj above about economists and recessions.
short aside: brute does not get the impression that physicists are better at predicting weather or the climate than economists are at predicting the economy. both are incredibly complex systems.
here's what brute believes is the likely, boring future of climate change:
- the planet continues getting a bit warmer for a few decades
- humans start shifting more towards renewable energy, especially where it makes sense
- rich countries will start this trend, but eventually upcoming countries will just entirely skip the fossil stage because it won't make economic sense, just like landlines these days are often skipped and countries just immediately invest in cell infrastructure
- fossil fuels will always be used to a degree, in niches where they just make more sense - maybe demands of energy density, petro chemistry, whatever. maybe the ratio of fossils will peter out but never go below 10-15% or so.
- even within the fossils used, rich countries will shift from dirtier (coal) to cleaner (natural gas) varieties. this has already happened - coal lost a lot of market share even under Bush, mostly to natural gas.
- modern nuclear power is very clean, very safe. brute hopes that it can form the backbone of a future energy mix. it is ~8% now in the US, maybe it can go to 30%.
- there will be certain negative effects from climate change, but not nearly as bad as in some of the doomsday predictions
- humanity will continue to get more prosperous at a dramatic pace, lifting the remaining millions (it is not even billions any more) humans out of poverty, allowing them to move from a hand-to-mouth mindset to a more far sighted economic vision that includes protecting the environment.
- the new riches will allow humans to make sacrifices much easier, and build solutions much more effectively and cheaply.
- this is not some kind of future-optimism with magic nano technology. it will be very boring 2%/year changes that slowly shift the situation from "probably a big problem" to "not that big a problem" over decades.
- in 2100, humans will say "huh, looks like that climate crisis was averted. oh well." in retrospect, it will look like the fear of interstate highways and transcontinental railroads and the Y2K bug. it's not that there were no problems, but they were surmountable.