Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 7:00 pm
I'm planning to move soon and take a new job, partially because I want something new, but mostly because they will pay my expenses to move and cover my closing costs as I step out of this ridiculous $400K house and trade it for something MUCH smaller.
I'll probably only stay in that city (Colorado Springs) for 2 years, maybe 3 unless we fall in love with it. After 2 years, I retire early (extremely!).
So as we look at houses and I run the math, I'm trying to figure out the best option. Here are my calculations, I want to see if anyone sees a flaw in it.
A house that is acceptable to my wife (she's not as ERE as I am) will cost $140K. I'll pay cash, so I'm assuming no closing cost fees to the bank and hopefully the ability to negotiate a lower price with the seller. When I sell it will cost me about 5% in realtor fees: $7000. The opportunity cost, assuming a 7% ROI of having that $140K sunk into the house is $19,600, so the overall cost for 2 years is: $26,600. Now I need to add insurance (~1%) and property taxes (1%), which gets me up to $28800. This comes out to $1200 per month over 2 years, with that number dropping the longer I stay.
Renting should be about $1250 per month. So buying is cheaper, but seems like a wash to me.
As I look at tie-breakers, I think that home ownership offers inflation protection and also has a better benefit if we do decide to stay longer. Afterall, 2 years flies by. However, home ownership also comes with more work and some risk to major fees if something breaks.
Seems like a wash, so I'm leaning towards home ownership since I think there's a reasonable chance we like it out there and decide to stay after I retire.
So what do ya'll think? What am I not considering?
I'll probably only stay in that city (Colorado Springs) for 2 years, maybe 3 unless we fall in love with it. After 2 years, I retire early (extremely!).
So as we look at houses and I run the math, I'm trying to figure out the best option. Here are my calculations, I want to see if anyone sees a flaw in it.
A house that is acceptable to my wife (she's not as ERE as I am) will cost $140K. I'll pay cash, so I'm assuming no closing cost fees to the bank and hopefully the ability to negotiate a lower price with the seller. When I sell it will cost me about 5% in realtor fees: $7000. The opportunity cost, assuming a 7% ROI of having that $140K sunk into the house is $19,600, so the overall cost for 2 years is: $26,600. Now I need to add insurance (~1%) and property taxes (1%), which gets me up to $28800. This comes out to $1200 per month over 2 years, with that number dropping the longer I stay.
Renting should be about $1250 per month. So buying is cheaper, but seems like a wash to me.
As I look at tie-breakers, I think that home ownership offers inflation protection and also has a better benefit if we do decide to stay longer. Afterall, 2 years flies by. However, home ownership also comes with more work and some risk to major fees if something breaks.
Seems like a wash, so I'm leaning towards home ownership since I think there's a reasonable chance we like it out there and decide to stay after I retire.
So what do ya'll think? What am I not considering?