Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:20 am
I've had a big change in circumstances recently. My partner got a good job 500 miles away, and I have quit my job to go and join him. Actually, the timing worked out really well as they were offering generous voluntary severance packages at my work, so I am walking away with a tidy sum when I was potentially leaving anyway.
My main dilemma is what to do about my house. My mortgage provider refused consent to let on my residential mortgage, and said I need to transfer to a buy to let mortgage. This means the interest rate more than doubles (from a sweet 2.5% to somewhere between 5 - 6%) and I also have to pay an "arrangement fee" of £1K. However, because I don't have a job at the moment (I can't even interview for jobs until the agreement is signed and sealed, or my former employer can retract the severance package if I have a job offer) it is very difficult to find a new mortgage provider, and actually my current provider might refuse me a buy to let mortgage. I need to phone them again soon. I could have just not informed them and hoped they wouldn't find out, but I stupidly phoned to inquire (because when I did this 6 years ago with my previous property I got permission no problem and just paid a £100 fee) and now they have a note one my file.
My options are therefore:
a) Try to sell the house. Properties around here are not selling fast: I know places that have been on the market for 18+ months. They are also selling for 10% less than I paid, and I have done some work to the house so would be down over 20%. We are also only renting in the new city, so would have no RE assets if we did manage to sell.
b) Accept the buy to let "deal" from my current mortgage provider if they decide I am eligible, and get screwed on fees and interest rate. I may also have to add my partner to the mortgage and also the title deeds in order to become eligible for the mortgage, which seems unfair given that he has no stake in the house.
c) Pay a mortgage broker to find me the best buy to let deal available for me. I have managed to have a look at some of these online (I can access a website that is only for professional intermediaries so I can see some of the deals but can't buy them directly) and the best deals (just under 4%) have a £4K arrangement fee, which is a crazy amount on a mortgage that would be for, at most £60K. Keeping a mortgage could involve either borrowing the same amount, or paying it down to just over £25K (the minimum you are allowed to borrow for most mortgages here) by throwing all my liquid cash savings at it.
d) Pay off the mortgage completely. This one involves selling at least 25% of my shares, as well as using all my spare cash. The shares are down around 15% on what I paid for them. When reading Jacob's journal he said that shares were expensive and real estate was cheap, so it made more sense for him to make a real estate purchase in cash. I'm not so sure that is the case in the UK, as a lot of our property is still overpriced. But I do think the stock market is going to be in turmoil for several years yet, so I can't count on them rebounding any time soon. The price I paid for the house is already locked in (i.e. the price I paid for it 6 years ago) so the issue is not whether the price is good, but whether it makes more sense to keep liquidity, and whether that liquidity is worth the high interest rates and fees.
My main dilemma is what to do about my house. My mortgage provider refused consent to let on my residential mortgage, and said I need to transfer to a buy to let mortgage. This means the interest rate more than doubles (from a sweet 2.5% to somewhere between 5 - 6%) and I also have to pay an "arrangement fee" of £1K. However, because I don't have a job at the moment (I can't even interview for jobs until the agreement is signed and sealed, or my former employer can retract the severance package if I have a job offer) it is very difficult to find a new mortgage provider, and actually my current provider might refuse me a buy to let mortgage. I need to phone them again soon. I could have just not informed them and hoped they wouldn't find out, but I stupidly phoned to inquire (because when I did this 6 years ago with my previous property I got permission no problem and just paid a £100 fee) and now they have a note one my file.
My options are therefore:
a) Try to sell the house. Properties around here are not selling fast: I know places that have been on the market for 18+ months. They are also selling for 10% less than I paid, and I have done some work to the house so would be down over 20%. We are also only renting in the new city, so would have no RE assets if we did manage to sell.
b) Accept the buy to let "deal" from my current mortgage provider if they decide I am eligible, and get screwed on fees and interest rate. I may also have to add my partner to the mortgage and also the title deeds in order to become eligible for the mortgage, which seems unfair given that he has no stake in the house.
c) Pay a mortgage broker to find me the best buy to let deal available for me. I have managed to have a look at some of these online (I can access a website that is only for professional intermediaries so I can see some of the deals but can't buy them directly) and the best deals (just under 4%) have a £4K arrangement fee, which is a crazy amount on a mortgage that would be for, at most £60K. Keeping a mortgage could involve either borrowing the same amount, or paying it down to just over £25K (the minimum you are allowed to borrow for most mortgages here) by throwing all my liquid cash savings at it.
d) Pay off the mortgage completely. This one involves selling at least 25% of my shares, as well as using all my spare cash. The shares are down around 15% on what I paid for them. When reading Jacob's journal he said that shares were expensive and real estate was cheap, so it made more sense for him to make a real estate purchase in cash. I'm not so sure that is the case in the UK, as a lot of our property is still overpriced. But I do think the stock market is going to be in turmoil for several years yet, so I can't count on them rebounding any time soon. The price I paid for the house is already locked in (i.e. the price I paid for it 6 years ago) so the issue is not whether the price is good, but whether it makes more sense to keep liquidity, and whether that liquidity is worth the high interest rates and fees.