Confusing your emotional reaction to another's action with the action itself

Simple living, extreme early retirement, becoming and being wealthy, wisdom, praxis, personal growth,...
Post Reply
Hristo Botev
Posts: 1743
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 3:42 am

Confusing your emotional reaction to another's action with the action itself

Post by Hristo Botev »

Specifically, the young folks saying something "is cringe" instead of saying that that something made them cringe; is this a harbinger of some sort of deeper generational shift from the way a Gen X person's internal brain furniture works, for example, to the way a Zoomer's brain furniture works?

Or is "that's cringe" just the latest in a centuries' long tradition of young folks identifying something based on how that something makes them react emotionally (and if so, what are some other examples?)?

Credit the latest OGB podcast for making me wonder about this: https://onlinegreatbooks.com/175-taylor ... education/

Western Red Cedar
Posts: 1237
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2020 2:15 pm

Re: Confusing your emotional reaction to another's action with the action itself

Post by Western Red Cedar »

I think this reflects the way each generation plays with language. The vernacular is constantly shifting.

I think the example of "is cringe" or "that's cringe" is just short for "that's cringeworthy". Maybe similar to a Gen X use of "that's wicked", "that's dope", "that's sweet", "that's righteous"?

User avatar
Jean
Posts: 1907
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:49 am
Location: Switzterland

Re: Confusing your emotional reaction to another's action with the action itself

Post by Jean »

since this issue is at the core of what non violent communication tries to address, and nvc is several decades old, it's probably not something new.

bostonimproper
Posts: 581
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2018 11:45 am

Re: Confusing your emotional reaction to another's action with the action itself

Post by bostonimproper »

+1 to what WRC said. No different from “that’s cool” or “that’s weird.” The tacked on “in my opinion” is silent.

AnalyticalEngine
Posts: 966
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2018 11:57 am

Re: Confusing your emotional reaction to another's action with the action itself

Post by AnalyticalEngine »

"That's cringe" just means something is uncool or a social faux pas. Obviously, what is uncool or faux pas is subjective, but there's really no deeper meaning to it than saying "this thing is uncool."

mathiverse
Posts: 800
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2019 8:40 pm

Re: Confusing your emotional reaction to another's action with the action itself

Post by mathiverse »

Don't Gen X and older also say "That's embarrassing"? That seems to express the same sentiment in the same way confused way.

ertyu
Posts: 2922
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 2:31 am

Re: Confusing your emotional reaction to another's action with the action itself

Post by ertyu »

cringe = it gives me second-hand embarassment

black_son_of_gray
Posts: 506
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 7:39 pm

Re: Confusing your emotional reaction to another's action with the action itself

Post by black_son_of_gray »

@OP, I don't know if this was covered in the podcast (didn't listen), but, outside of the emotional context, what you are describing is essentially nominalization.

e.g. "To cringe" (verb) > is "cringe" (noun)

This process can also work backwards, e.g. "Google" (a search engine, noun)>"to google" (to search on internet, verb). Personally, I don't see any deep connection to generational differences and/or emotional reactions; I think it's just a little quirk of language.

Post Reply