Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Ask your investment, budget, and other money related questions here
Dream of Freedom
Posts: 753
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Nebraska, US

Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by Dream of Freedom »

Berkshire Hathaway Inc.’s Charlie Munger told a conference Friday that markets are wildly overvalued in places and that the current environment is “even crazier” than the dotcom boom of the late 1990s that subsequently led to a bust.

“I consider this era an even crazier era than the dotcom era,” Munger, 97, said at the Sohn conference in Sydney
Munger also said that he wished cryptocurrencies didn’t exist, and praised China for taking action to ban their use, according to the AFR.

“I wish they’d never been invented,” he said. “And again I admire the Chinese, I think they made the correct decision, which was to simply ban them. In my country, English-speaking civilization has made the wrong decision, I just can’t stand participating in these insane booms, one way or another.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... otcom-bust

chenda
Posts: 3281
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 1:17 pm
Location: Nether Wallop

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by chenda »

I completely agree with everything he said.

JCD
Posts: 139
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2019 9:12 am

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by JCD »

I'm not long any crypto, but I think Charlie goes a tad bit too far regarding cryptos. I can imagine a world where crypto creates value, but this just feels more like the .com boom rather than a real solution set. As for the market in general, I agree with Charlie, but there can still be bargains to be found and certainly some folks are already bag holders-- I'm looking at you zoom and peloton. I think Charlie's best general advice is to know where you will die and not go there. Much of the overpriced speculation in the market are clearly places you can die, so I avoid them.

User avatar
conwy
Posts: 194
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 2:06 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by conwy »

markets are wildly overvalued in places
Looking at you Tesla!
“I wish they’d never been invented,”
He can wish what he wants, but does that mean they're going up or down, relative to USD?

Salathor
Posts: 394
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2015 11:49 am
Location: California, USA

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by Salathor »

I think he's right that crypto is a terrible place for "investment," but the use case for decentralized digital cash is certainly there. It just won't work when the coins are rapidly changing value and are slow and expensive to transact.

User avatar
unemployable
Posts: 1007
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 11:36 am
Location: Homeless

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by unemployable »

"Crypto is by nature limited in supply." Except it isn't. New cryptos are being created all the time. Some of them, most of them probably, will get Myspaced and I'm not going to try to figure out which one will be Facebook.

jacob
Site Admin
Posts: 15859
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:38 pm
Location: USA, Zone 5b, Koppen Dfa, Elev. 620ft, Walkscore 77
Contact:

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by jacob »

unemployable wrote:
Sat Dec 04, 2021 1:04 pm
"Crypto is by nature limited in supply." Except it isn't. New cryptos are being created all the time. Some of them, most of them probably, will get Myspaced and I'm not going to try to figure out which one will be Facebook.
Someone should make a set of Tom NFTs. It'll probably sell for thousands, ironically. Free idea.

chenda
Posts: 3281
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 1:17 pm
Location: Nether Wallop

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by chenda »

What happens if/when they all get banned ?

User avatar
unemployable
Posts: 1007
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 11:36 am
Location: Homeless

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by unemployable »

chenda wrote:
Sat Dec 04, 2021 1:27 pm
What happens if/when they all get banned ?
They won't, not by civilized countries at least. They will, however, get regulated and taxed when their revenue and taxation potential starts to outcompete existing economic schemes. See: online merchants and sales tax, uber, airbnb...

bostonimproper
Posts: 579
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2018 11:45 am

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by bostonimproper »

Didn’t Berkshire Hathaway avoid tech investments for most of the last two decades because Munger & Buffett didn’t feel they knew the tech space well enough? Not to say tech/crypto aren’t in a bubble, but I would venture to guess Munger is somewhat overly pessimistic/conservative about the space.

alex123711
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri May 15, 2020 8:33 pm

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by alex123711 »

Salathor wrote:
Sat Dec 04, 2021 11:42 am
I think he's right that crypto is a terrible place for "investment," but the use case for decentralized digital cash is certainly there. It just won't work when the coins are rapidly changing value and are slow and expensive to transact.
I always ask bitcoin advocates what is bitcoin worth and when was the last time you used it for a purchase, I haven't had any answers yet. Also like you said nobody wants to spend them as they don't want to end up like that guy that purchased a pizza with bitcoin years ago that would now be worth 100k+

chenda
Posts: 3281
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 1:17 pm
Location: Nether Wallop

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by chenda »

unemployable wrote:
Sat Dec 04, 2021 1:41 pm
They won't, not by civilized countries at least. They will, however, get regulated and taxed when their revenue and taxation potential starts to outcompete existing economic schemes. See: online merchants and sales tax, uber, airbnb...
Yes I think you're right. It seems much tighter regulation is starting to be applied in many countries.

User avatar
Jean
Posts: 1886
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:49 am
Location: Switzterland

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by Jean »

You can use it in salvador to buy anything trough lightning. It works faster than credit card, with much less fees. At the moment outside salvador, it's just an adoption issue, but as a money, it's clearly superior to every other money, and the only way fiat have a chance of maintaining their supremacy will be trough force. The only question to ask is if entities that benefit from the supremacy of fiat currencies have the mean to stop adoption of bitcoin.

Salathor
Posts: 394
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2015 11:49 am
Location: California, USA

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by Salathor »

Jean wrote:
Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:22 pm
it's clearly superior to every other money
I would say it's superior in MANY ways to several types of money, but not STRICTLY better than ALL types of money. Gold is inviolable and eternal, can be crafted in new shapes, and works in the absence of both electricity and internet connection, all strengths that bitcoin lacks.

User avatar
Seppia
Posts: 2009
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:34 am
Location: South Florida

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by Seppia »

It’s funny to declare Bitcoin as a superior money few hours after it lost 18% in 12 hours.

Imagine how practical it would be to grocery shop with that kind of volatility

rube
Posts: 881
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:54 pm
Location: Europe (NL)

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by rube »

@seppia, but there is no brrrrrrr so at least no inflation from printing ;-)

This seems to be turning into a btc thread, but I am more fascinated by the fact that Munger is at age 97 still so up to date, passion full about this all etc. Again, 97 years old.

User avatar
fiby41
Posts: 1610
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 8:09 am
Location: India
Contact:

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by fiby41 »

bostonimproper wrote:
Sat Dec 04, 2021 4:07 pm
Didn’t Berkshire Hathaway avoid tech investments for most of the last two decades because Munger & Buffett didn’t feel they knew the tech space well enough?
Munger said "they don't undestand technology but he understands advertising. They were using google for advertising their insurance business and still missed out."

ducknald_don
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2020 12:31 pm
Location: Oxford, UK

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by ducknald_don »

Didn't they make a big investment in Apple.

User avatar
Seppia
Posts: 2009
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:34 am
Location: South Florida

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by Seppia »

rube wrote:
Sun Dec 05, 2021 3:58 am
I am more fascinated by the fact that Munger is at age 97 still so up to date, passion full about this all etc.
I think people who are such outliers either have to be 100% genuinely passionate about what they do or they get so defined by their character that they just cannot stop.
I’m thinking if Munger had stopped working at age 89 he would have been dead by age 90.
This is what fuels him

white belt
Posts: 1450
Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 12:15 am

Re: Charlie Munger - “even crazier” than the dotcom boom

Post by white belt »

There is already another BTC thread if you want to argue about the utility of cryptocurrency: viewtopic.php?t=7848

In terms of the dotcom boom comparison, I think there's a lot of truth in that. However, as I understand it the dotcom boom was not exacerbated by fiscal and monetary policy, which play a large role in the dynamic today. Further, you didn't have the level of debt (to include gov't) and leverage across the entire system that we have today. The Fed raised the federal funds rate to ~6% in order to prick the dotcom bubble. The current fed funds rate is 25 basis points.

Additionally, you didn't have the TINA dynamic for everyone from retail to institutional and enormous monthly "dumb money" inflows into indexes like you do now, which tend to increase volatility due to little price sensitivity.

So it's not so much of a question of whether this is a bubble, more so the questions are:

1. Can/will the Fed attempt to accelerate tapering and reduce rates? Powell talked big game about accelerating tapering recently (perhaps in an attempt to slow markets without having to actually risk causing a recession), but the Fed is still backstopping a variety of credit markets to include mortgage-back securities. Right now the political trade off is reduce inflation or slow the economy.

2. Will fiscal policy play a large role in the next few years like it did at the beginning of the pandemic? Political gridlock seems like the default recently, but things are difficult to predict especially as we move into midterms in 2022. The government could easily blast out another round of stimulus in the next economic "crisis" whether that be COVID-related, energy-related, etc. I'm trying to avoid political discussions about what gov't should do and just frame some of the possibilities.

3. How long can the current system continue? This is the hardest to predict and the answer is probably "until it can't." We can go back over the past 5+ years and see all sorts of comments about how sentiment is ridiculously high and assets are overvalued, yet the party continued on.
Last edited by white belt on Sun Dec 05, 2021 8:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply