

One of the biggest reason I wanted a house...
You're talking about Electric Forest. I'll be there this summer, so let me know if you end up making it over. And I don't know what the ticket resale looks like - but original price was roughly ~$300 a piece.thrifty++ wrote:
I had been thinking about going to Burning Man this summer if I end up in North America. I really like the vibe of it but I really dont like the cost of it and the fact that its in a desert. Do any of you North Americans know of a similar Electronic Dance Music festival in North America this summer but with elements of trees/grass/shade/bush/rivers/lakes/beaches etc? Something with a Burning Man vibe but not desert and not somewhere with heaps of bros and hoes. Something more bohemian
DW went to Electric Daisy in Orlando last November with a friend who won free tickets to it. She had a pretty good time.Slevin wrote:You're talking about Electric Forest.
I wonder. The above struck me because the last time I heard the words "Restoration Hardware", they were coming out of the mouth of my somewhat older, much, much, more financially affluent lover as he was describing some aspect of the major home renovation he is supervising as he was lying next to me on my $12 homemade futon-lol.Dragline said: An older Gen-X household will be either "Dollar Store or Restoration Hardware." This is quite true. Gen-X has huge winners and losers and relatively few in the middle. The anger and bitterness on the lower end is palpable.
Last night we had dinner with an Xer couple who we hadn't seen in years. He had become a conspiracy theorist, in part because life had thrown him a series of curveballs, sliders and fastballs when he had only been taught to catch underhanded softballs. There was zero adaptation. Only anger, bitterness, and a snarling yet bewildered resentment. Doing the same thing over and over, yet expecting a different result.....7Wannabe5 wrote:I have an odd perspective on generational differences and aging because I am demographically out of sync in a way that makes me simultaneously younger and older than most of my peers.
I wonder if they are angry because they allowed themselves to be shown what success looks like rather than defining it for themselves. By contorting into someone else's vision of success, then getting twisted into knots, they're furious for being duped into "doing everything they were supposed to do".Dragline wrote:@Ego -- I have friends like that, too. Many very jaded and suspicious people who have difficulty dealing with life's failures, especially when they see a few others around them with less talent who have succeeded in a big way.
I've never read a definitive date for the start of Gen X, so I've been confused, too. Ted Rall calls me (and himself) a Gen Xer, both born in 63. But until then I thought I was a late Boomer, as well as a late bloomer.Dragline wrote:Typical sloppy/uninformed analysis from MSM/Salon -- they always get confused by starting that Gen in 1964 instead of 1961. Obama is in fact a pro-to Xer. But to be successful, all Gen-x politicians have to appeal to Boomers and/or Millennials. This is what Rubio and Cruz are doing (with the conservative Boomers), although Cruz actually sweeps up some more Gen-X people too.
Strauss & Howe who were/are the expert historians of this stuff and wrote all the books about it start Generation X at 1961, because its supposed to encompass people to have the same experience growing up and be keyed just prior to major societal events that they would not remember as really small children -- here the assassination of JFK and the cultural shift that happened in 1963-1965. They also date the Boomers from 1942-1961 for the same reason (key event victory in WWII).enigmaT120 wrote:I've never read a definitive date for the start of Gen X, so I've been confused, too. Ted Rall calls me (and himself) a Gen Xer, both born in 63. But until then I thought I was a late Boomer, as well as a late bloomer.Dragline wrote:Typical sloppy/uninformed analysis from MSM/Salon -- they always get confused by starting that Gen in 1964 instead of 1961. Obama is in fact a pro-to Xer. But to be successful, all Gen-x politicians have to appeal to Boomers and/or Millennials. This is what Rubio and Cruz are doing (with the conservative Boomers), although Cruz actually sweeps up some more Gen-X people too.
Yes. I have a couple of these in my extended family. Not only are they bitter about having "followed the rules" and not achieved what they had accepted as success, they're hostile to anyone who didn't follow those same rules yet seems to be "ahead" in spite of this (where "ahead" equals wealthier). I have been an occasional target of this hostility. Specifically, I am a college dropout who achieved STEM success in a family full of higher academics. I'm sure you can all see the problem... to some of them, I cheated and my success doesn't count. It's on par with winning the lottery and is equally admirable. I'm also not intelligent because I didn't finish my degree, a lazy bum for retiring early, and a highly dangerous and anti-social human being for advocating alternative non-college life paths to certain of the family's teenagers. I would probably attend to their scorn if they were happy and I was not, but I find it's the reverse. Another source of frustration, I'm sure. It hurts to be looked down upon by my own family, I admit, but I can't fix that sort of prejudice.Ego wrote:I wonder if they are angry because they allowed themselves to be shown what success looks like rather than defining it for themselves. By contorting into someone else's vision of success, then getting twisted into knots, they're furious for being duped into "doing everything they were supposed to do".