Re: C40's Journal
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 10:58 am
On May 1, C40 wrote:
[img]file:///C:/Users/user1/Desktop/PercentAdditionalSavingsForEachAdditionalLowerPointOfSWR.PNG[/img]
So, from 3% to 2% it´s 50% more savings, but from 3% to 1% it´s 200% more savings. Effort might be less because of higher savings rates and reinvestments, but it´s still a lot more.
Similar numbers could be produced for adding more people.
FWIW
After reading this, I continued to think about the calculations for this decision of which SWR to target, 3%, 2%, or 1%. I thought it might be helpful to make the calculations explicit:LEVELS OF FI
I’ve been reading Tony Robbins’ recent book: Money: Master the Game. I’m 1/3 through it and so far, it’s mostly your standard it’s mostly your standard personal finance book aimed at most of the population. It does contain some better information than just your standard “automate 10%+ savings and work to 65” type advice. It has pretty compelling advice to dig into your 401k expenses/fees. It also has this hierarchy of Financial Independence. (I added the SWR estimates for each level. These would be SWR needed for total current spending)
Financial Security ~10% SWR - Investment income that covers your current basic living expenses. Housing, food, utilities, transportation, insurance
Financial Vitality ~5% SWR –Investment income covers the above, plus half of your current spending on clothes, hobbies, and entertainment
Financial Independence ~3% SWR – Investment income covers your current total spending
Financial Freedom ~2% SWR – Investment income covers all current spending, plus some luxury spending in the future on things very important to you.
Absolute Financial Freedom: <1% SWR – Huge luxuries, spending without thinking, giving significant money to others, using money to improve the world.
On this scale, I’m targeting somewhere between Financial Independence and Financial Freedom.
[img]file:///C:/Users/user1/Desktop/PercentAdditionalSavingsForEachAdditionalLowerPointOfSWR.PNG[/img]
So, from 3% to 2% it´s 50% more savings, but from 3% to 1% it´s 200% more savings. Effort might be less because of higher savings rates and reinvestments, but it´s still a lot more.
Similar numbers could be produced for adding more people.
FWIW