![Cool 8-)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
IOW do build you "compound", but don't stick it out to the bitter end if circumstances change. Every problem has a unique solution. Don't get overly married to your hammer.
I can't argue with that.Riggerjack wrote:JP, that's what I meant when I said, "If there was one thing everyone should have learned from Ruby Ridge, it's that no target is safe."
As a civilian, given time and drive and about 10k, I'm certain that I can drive off that first SWAT team, but that is as light as it gets, and I'd have to break NFA rules to do it, thus inviting the SWAT team.
I'm not talking about building a bunker. As I said, their time has passed. I'm talking about reducing dependencies by increasing capabilities.
I must say that specific look of a website always makes me think something negative about the person/website. It's a tough and rather scattered read. Moving every 90 days would be difficult if you had to do it for long. I look more into how Jim Rogers has made his move as a semi-template than something I would just do temporarily.Riggerjack wrote: For the just go where it's better crowd, read this:
http://www.johntreed.com/90-day-tourist ... ugees.html
John T Reed is a believer in hyperinflaton, to the point of writing a book on dealing with it. Me, I don't think it'll happen, but this is a nice read on the tourist visa escape route, along with pitfalls. Getting out and finding a haven isn't as easy as some like to think. He's old, and has a VERY direct writing style, factor that in when reading.
To a Dragline with a dynamic, temporal hammer, every problem looks like an exercise in foolish consistency and static thinking.jacob wrote:I'm surprised Dragline hasn't recommend doing both yet?
IOW do build you "compound", but don't stick it out to the bitter end if circumstances change. Every problem has a unique solution. Don't get overly married to your hammer.