Page 2 of 5

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2018 5:00 am
by Jason
7Wannabe5 wrote:
Fri Jun 22, 2018 7:06 am
Day 3: Some guy pulls up in his RV, spots me digging for edible insects in the woods, and points to his grill full of burgers.
I always wondered what Ronald McDonald did after work.

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2018 5:18 am
by FBeyer
Heads up: It says burgers, not "burgers".

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2018 5:35 am
by Jason
I didn't realize this transient camp was so popular.

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2018 11:47 am
by 7Wannabe5
@thegreatvoid:

Yup, a little tri doesn't hurt much either.

@Jason:

Thanks for that imagery. I'm already a little bit frightened on Day 1, and then some guy emerges from an RV dressed in a clown suit?


Anyways, I am fretting a little bit about whether my new housemate is eventually going to hit on me. I am currently fatter than I like to be, so since I was a suburban white girl, that makes me think "No", but then my garden-partner hit on me this morning ("Don't worry about the garden, I will take care of everything, but you really ought to come over and visit with me sometime soon." (putting his hand on my back as I walk out the door) )when I went over to drop off some equipment keys, so it's possible that I have not past over the line of repulsive yet.

My point being that it is still not nice to imply that Ronald McDonald is the only man who would hit on me if I was alone in the woods.

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2018 12:36 pm
by Jason
I didn't mean to imply that Ronald McDonald would he be the only man to hit on you if you were alone in the woods. You have to think Bigfoot likes 'em a bit zaftig. Although technically speaking, I believe he is considered an "ape like being" and not a "man."

In all semi-seriousness, based upon above chronicled events, it does not appear that you would have any problem having your expanding ass Big Bad Wolfed. Come to think about it, the only thing I have read about being passed around more than you in last couple of weeks is The Stanley Cup. Garnering male attention does not seem to be any issue for you.

On an unrelated note, even with my embarrassingly robust TV watching experience, I never watched "The Golden Girls". When it comes to bonerkills, Bea Arthur is like Nazi Germany. But recently, my wife has been watching it and I have to say, there is some really dark undertones to that show. I thought it would be one endless celebration of post-maxipad life, but damn, its like the network TV equivalent of thegreatvoid's blog.

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2018 1:10 pm
by 7Wannabe5
"The Golden Girls" and "Murder She Wrote" were my DD27's (INTJ) favorite shows when she was a very young child. You might think the golden girl I most resemble would be Blanche, but I've been informed that I am much more like Rose. I think you are right about the dark undertones, because my daughter's favorite author was Edgar Allen Poe. She thinks that she is most like Dorothy, but she looks more like a cross between Jennifer Aniston and Princess Di (her father was prettier than me.) I am a little bit afraid that she might lovingly, but forcefully install me in some posh senior encampment sometime in the mid-21st century.

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2018 2:10 pm
by Jason
I wasn't identifying you with any but I can see the ditzy, good hearted parallel. My wiki studies informed me that Betty White did not want to play Blanche because it was too close to Sue Ann Nivens.

If I picked up correctly, they live together based on economic necessity. They all seem to be working. One is widow, one's husband left her for a younger woman. I think in one episode Blanche fucked to death a man she didn't realize was married. It's really some dark shit.

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 10:27 am
by 7Wannabe5
Well, I quit my garden center job, but I didn't break up with my absentee BF. So, six weeks of summer left with nothing to do but road trip, swim, and study. I might have to give up on ever being anything but Intermittent Style ERE. I can't seem to stop myself from quitting employment-by-other as soon as my emergency fund is refilled and a wee bit of roll forward is secured. Marshmallow test drop-out.

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 10:43 am
by Jason
7Wannabe5 wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 10:27 am
So, six weeks of summer left with nothing to do but road trip, swim, and study.
Hopefully you'll run into that really hot guy from the T-Birds and have a summer romance before school starts up again.

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 11:09 am
by 7Wannabe5
lol- Could happen, but my BF stepped up to the plate a bit more assertively in his last e-mail from 17 zones distant, so I am inclined to stick with contract for the time being. I love to play, and I frequently renegotiate or end contract, but I never cheat.

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 11:32 am
by Jason
(@) 7SandraDee5

Out of real curiosity, what are the conditions required for proper termination of contract? For instance, let's say a dimpled and duck tailed greaser rocking a forearm bearing cut-off T-Shirt pulls over and offers your itinerant ass a ride back from the beach in his just hot waxed convertible and your lady parts are informing you that this is a unique and unrepeatable event that your finite feminine experience in good conscience just cannot pass upon. Can you just text 17 Zones Away Man "Sorry, deal breaker"? Do you have to call him and say "I am hereby invoking clause 17B of Paragraph 6 outlining Right To Terminate whereby upon extreme and unbearable temptation either party may kick the other to the long distance curb?" I would think in these instances spur of the moment is more likely than a thought out, deliberate breach. Especially with six weeks of summer bearing down upon you.

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 12:06 pm
by 7Wannabe5
Well, it is actually a bit more complex than that. The terms of our contract are polyamorous with full disclosure and agreement. So, termination of contract would be either:

A) I don't want to see you anymore.

B) I am going to do whatever I want with whomever I want without running it by you.

Therefore, even though my Permaculture Partner is a very sexy man, and he fed me 3 beers (that's like super-wasted for me), and made clear play one day last week, I did not allow my lady parts to take the wheel, because I know that my BF is very ambivalent about me rekindling sexual involvement with man who is also my project partner, because that would rival degree of relationship.

So, hitting it with J.T. would almost certainly not constitute a deal-breaker, but "romance" with J.T. might. Unless, I could really keep it within parameters of "just one of those things" or "summer romance." My BF has pretty much granted me free rein to interact with any man under the age of 40, given reasonable/usual degree of precaution,especially if he is player/poly, because then "romance", or really something more like switch of primary alliance, is not likely.

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 1:20 pm
by Jason
As I understand this current arrangement, JT is permissible from the Welcome Back Kotter/Saturday Night Fever/Grease peak years, the Staying Alive/Perfect over commercialization saturation period, the leaner Look Who's Talking I-XV years, but stopping at point of Pulp Fiction revival. From that point on he considered off limits for the once again commercial viable Face Off period up to the current can't keep track of hair piece, full blown wackadoodle Scientology I'm not providing medical assistance to my Autistic son period.

I'm assuming your current contract is with someone more concerned with competing against parallel maturity and money then youth and indiscriminate sexual vigor.

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 1:44 pm
by 7Wannabe5
Jason wrote:I'm assuming your current contract is with someone more concerned with competing against parallel maturity and money then youth and indiscriminate sexual vigor.
Right, but only if it would limit access to me. For instance, he would be okay if I renewed my relationship with my older, affluent, married lover, because the fact that he is married would be the limiting factor. He thought it was funny when we were first dating that he was directly competing with my affluent married lover in the realm of taking me out to good/better/best restaurants. He doesn't want me to see the Yacht Guy because he knows that the Yacht Guy has a house on the lake that he might want me to live in with him. IOW, he mostly just wants to ensure that when he comes back to the U.S next year, I will still be available to go grocery shopping and watch M.A.S.H. reruns in the evening with him.

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2018 3:29 pm
by 7Wannabe5
*

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2018 3:41 pm
by BRUTE
Texas economy apparently doing very well right now

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2018 3:48 pm
by Bankai
Isn't Texas a 'macho man' state? I.e. higher chance for tanned, ripped, affluent, dominant, elder males?

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2018 3:58 pm
by 7Wannabe5
*

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2018 4:02 pm
by 7Wannabe5
@Bankai:

Are you suggesting some kind of hitch and flip?

Re: 7Wannabe5-Take 4

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2018 6:10 pm
by BRUTE
brute says 7Wannabe5 should go for it. change of scenery never hurt anyone.