All things being equal..time passes faster the older you are...1 year is 10% of the lifetime of a 10 year old and 1.25% of an 80 yr old.
But since things are not equal...dull routine is the enemy of time..and conversely intentional variety makes the time going by seem elongated.
The passing of time: Is 10 years really a long time?
-
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 12:10 am
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2020 1:42 pm
Re: The passing of time: Is 10 years really a long time?
When you're a young adult, 10 years is a SHITLOAD of time. A decade ago, I was in the fifth grade. A lifetime of things have happened since then.
Think of it this way. In 10 years, you age from 10-20 years of age. Likewise, you age from 20-30 and 30-40, and so on. An entire decade passes between each. The average person lives until the age of 80, meaning they get only 8 of these 10 year periods in their entire life. Relative to human importance, ten years is a scary amount of time.
Think of it this way. In 10 years, you age from 10-20 years of age. Likewise, you age from 20-30 and 30-40, and so on. An entire decade passes between each. The average person lives until the age of 80, meaning they get only 8 of these 10 year periods in their entire life. Relative to human importance, ten years is a scary amount of time.
-
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2020 6:43 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: The passing of time: Is 10 years really a long time?
I am reading this thread in chronological order so don't know if this sentence has been addressed, but man this put a smile on my face!
Philip Zimbardo (inventor of the Stanford prison experiment) wrote a book on the perception of time if I am not mistaken, it is called 'The Time Paradox.'
Re: The passing of time: Is 10 years really a long time?
@guitarplayer
Which reminds me....a great thing about ERE level savings is that at any point in your life from 20-30, 30-40, 40-50....you could sprint out the accumulation phase and be done with it if one so desired.
OTOH, I'd rather be done with it early on for cognitive reasons. I feel like working memory is probably better when you're younger. Not like one won't be smart in there 40s but then you'll have to compete a bit with the younger hungrier, possibly more motivation generation on jobs. Unless you just go into business for yourself and hire the younglings.
Which reminds me....a great thing about ERE level savings is that at any point in your life from 20-30, 30-40, 40-50....you could sprint out the accumulation phase and be done with it if one so desired.
OTOH, I'd rather be done with it early on for cognitive reasons. I feel like working memory is probably better when you're younger. Not like one won't be smart in there 40s but then you'll have to compete a bit with the younger hungrier, possibly more motivation generation on jobs. Unless you just go into business for yourself and hire the younglings.