Page 1 of 1

Dental Insurance is Backwards?

Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2016 7:02 am
by Gilberto de Piento
Dental insurance in my experience seems to pay for routine, predictable treatment like teeth cleaning and x rays. It apparently does not pay for replacement of a failing filling. Why is this? Cleaning and x rays are relatively cheap and done on a schedule. I don't need help from insurance for these. I do need help paying for treatment which is expensive and unpredictable, but the insurance is useless there. Why is this?

Re: Dental Insurance is Backwards?

Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2016 7:25 am
by chicago81
I think you are exactly right. The cost of two cash-price dental exams/cleanings at my dentist is cheaper than the amount my employer had been taking out of my paychecks for the "insurance". And there are deductibles and co-insurance for any additional procedures. For me, it doesn't make sense to buy this "insurance" anymore, and during the upcoming open-enrollment period, I will be declining it.

Re: Dental Insurance is Backwards?

Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:40 am
by jacob
Might be backwards for you, but for the insurance company(*), it's quite forwards :mrgreen:

(*) "Turning consumers into dependable cash flows since 19xx".

Re: Dental Insurance is Backwards?

Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:52 am
by BRUTE
many humans brute knows effectively have "new phone every year insurance"^^

Re: Dental Insurance is Backwards?

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2020 7:02 am
by Stahlmann
in hindsight, everything seems easy...

Re: Dental Insurance is Backwards?

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2020 8:59 am
by Campitor
I pay for dental insurance but my wife also gets dental insurance for "free" as a government employee. My dentist will split any cost across both insurance so I pay little to zero for crowns, fillings, etc.