It's a polite version of the "everybody has a duty [to work]". You see it in the Silent Generation and ideas like "from each according to their ability (or means) to each according to their needs". It's also related to the "what if everybody did it"-argument in the sense that those who are heavily vested in the current system---especially pay-as-you-go [pyramid scheme] pensions---worry that people won't buy into it.
Also see http://earlyretirementextreme.com/three ... usion.html (shows its age in that it was written so long ago that Millenials were still in college. It's now clear what their version of retirement is, namely just the FI part of FIRE)
Suze Orman Hates FIRE
Re: Suze Orman Hates FIRE
Factually correct?
Sorry. I’d say it denies them my contribution. Robbery requires rights of ownership.
Sorry. I’d say it denies them my contribution. Robbery requires rights of ownership.