It is currently Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:14 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:05 pm 

Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:28 am
Posts: 2705
Location: Orygun

http://finance.yahoo.com/focus-retirement/article/112212/stop-saving-so-much-for-retirement?mod=fidelity-readytoretire&cat=fidelity_2010_getting_ready_to_retire


"Work until you're 70 so you can have a higher income in retirement"


Bwa-ha-ha-ha... someone doesn't like early retirees!




Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:51 pm 

Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:43 pm
Posts: 505

If her conception of "early" retirement is 62, this forum would cause her head to burst. It also rests on a fairly glib premise that full SS benefits will still be available when one reaches 70 y.o.


Frankly, I don't want to go on a cruise to alleviate my servitude. I want to chisel off my shackles NOW and sleep late, waking to the enviable prospect of doing nothing more taxing than reading, sipping iced tea, and lounging around in my boxers.




Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 12:04 am 
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:38 pm
Posts: 5148
Location: Chicago, IL

So if I keep working until I'm dead, I don't need to save anything. (Slaps forehead) Why didn't I think of that?!




Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:02 am 

Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 7:34 pm
Posts: 170

It's only a matter of time now until you find an article with advice like:


"The best way to retire is to work until you die and spend all your money to increase the quality of those two weeks you get off every year."




Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:57 am 

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:21 pm
Posts: 772

Here, we have a stereotypical catch 22:


Work until your 70, in order to enjoy your 60's.


Enjoy your 60's while your working until your 70.


So if your still working during your 60's, what exactly are you enjoying? Your burning up your remaining life energy during your 60's so you can sluff on the couch when age 70. Let's face it, after age 70, how much is there? Some of you older soldiers tell me that. So do you by 70 live off SS and lie on the sofa? Eating grapes and watching "The price is right'? or "Wheel of Fortune"? And wishing you were the person winning something? * (Or my personal favorite show, Emergency.) "51, start an IV with D5W, and transport as soon as possible".

"We're on our way Rampart"! (Bet none of you younger soldiers remember that one"?


RRRRRRRRRRR-----DOES NOT COMPUTE!!!!




Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 2:03 am 

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:46 pm
Posts: 92


So if I keep working until I'm dead, I don't need to save anything.


I suppose this is the Later Retirement Extreme strategy.


I originally thought this article was tongue-in-cheek, but on a second read I'm not so sure. At least the closing paragraph includes this:



... Save like you'll be on your own tomorrow. Live each day like it could be your last.


which should provide some food for thought, when juxtaposed with retirement at 70.


As mentioned in the comments, this is a horrible "plan" and was probably intended to catch eyeballs rather than inform. I can't think of too many jobs where one can work full time through their sixties, to say nothing of illness, layoffs, or other life events.




Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 2:12 am 

Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 9:58 pm
Posts: 431

It's all part of the consumerist cycle. All players participating in the game need as many buy-in's as possible. It's really unbelievable.




Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 3:34 am 

Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:43 pm
Posts: 505

My dad died less than three weeks short of his 65th birthday. I'm fairly certain he would have wished to retire at 62 -- or earlier -- if he'd known that was coming. And I doubt he'd think that the Carribean cruise he took at 62 (25th wedding anniversary) was anywhere near an adequate substitute. I was 19 at the time and I vowed to live each day with a "seize the day" mentality. Looking back now with a thirty-year perspective, I haven't always succeeded in practicing that intention; but I have a better than average track record and I am absolutely committed to retiring well before 62, let alone 70.




Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 4:48 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 2:07 am
Posts: 589

Maus, ditto on that. I regularly hear experts say that retiring at 65 is almost unnatural, people have a lot of good working years left. Well, that depends on your luck (genetics).




Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:00 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 6:46 am
Posts: 569

What's funny is, this is the same argument I hear all the time, just with different numbers. "Why retire when you're 30? If you just work 10 more years until you're 40 you'll have so much more money to enjoy life with (cruises, luxury cars, a beach house) and still retire 25 years before everyone else!"


Most of the time I hear people, in reaction to ERE, try to argue that I ought to be working and saving for a longer period. It's nice to see in this article's comments section that 90% of people are now arguing the opposite, simply because the numbers have changed a bit.


It just seems strange to me though.


If it's SO important to retire before 70 and enjoy financial freedom for a few years because it improves your quality of life, wouldn't it follow then that it's all the more important to try to retire in your 30's and get that much more enjoyment out of life? If financial freedom is so wonderful, why limit it to something to be enjoyed in your 60's and 70's?




Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 9:54 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 6:00 pm
Posts: 1937
Location: Rockies

Give up [the possibility] a jet set retirement full of expensive wining and dining?


I'd rather work myself to death!




Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 12:07 am 

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:18 pm
Posts: 9

They hopefully lost everyone at "Fahlund's illustration assumes both couples hit age 60 with $450,000 in the pot." ????? So the best example they that could come up with has the live-it-uppers not even 'living it up' (not saving) until 2 years before the hard savers retire? Good grief, that makes 'living it up' (not saving) for a whole lifetime and planning to keep working forever, or retiring on just S.S. at 70, sound like an awesome plan...




Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 5:48 pm 

Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:03 am
Posts: 18

Hspencer-


A side note on your comment.


[(Or my personal favorite show, Emergency.) "51, start an IV with D5W, and transport as soon as possible".

"We're on our way Rampart"! (Bet none of you younger soldiers remember that one"?]


Best show on TV now (they play it on the retro TV channel here),

and possibly ever (1st generation MASH might take the cake, though) I don't know if 34 counts as a "younger soldier",

but I love Emergency.


They actually gave a 30 minute presentation on the show when

I was in paramedic school (about ten years ago) on how much the show

did foundationally for EMS. Watching the show, it really is

amazing how ahead of its time it was considering it is 40 years

old....SCBA, EKG's, Defibrillation, Cardiac Drugs....


There's still only one cool way to pop the tops off epi

and sodium bicarb!


-FF




Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 6:51 pm 

Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:15 pm
Posts: 280

Yep, EMS was controversial back in those days. "You're going to take firefighters and pay them not to fight fires?!" "That's what ambulances are for!" etc. Emergency intelligently took that controversy, ran with it, and as you said, set a zeitgeist foundation.


Of course, sometimes we go too far the other direction. Now we have full fire trucks along with the EMS vehicle showing up at houses for asthma attacks.




Top
Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 9:00 pm 

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:21 pm
Posts: 772

Yes sir, RETRO TV is indeed where it's at.


Trouble is here, we're into the re-runs that I just saw last fall on Emergency, but who cares? I still love Julie "cry me a river" London, and Bobby "get your kicks on route 66" Troup.

Of course I also enjoy all the others as well. Dr Brackett is cool when he handles a crappy patient. I guess one just can't seem to get enough "EMERGENCY"!! I still like "Dragnet" and "Adam 12" a lot too.


Here is what, however, flips my switch the wrong way: When you go on the net and look up Randolph Mantooth or Kevin Tighe, currently, they look so old!!!! Yikes, I am the same age!!!




Top
Offline Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© 2010-2014 Early Retirement Extreme Forums. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Theme created StylerBB.net