Convince me that I should have children.

How to pass, fit in, eventually set an example, and ultimately lead the way.
henrik
Posts: 757
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: EE

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by henrik »

Dragline wrote:Yes, there are studies that show that average life happiness reaches a nadir at about 40 and improves from there. I'm not aware of anyone who has ever bothered to distinguish those will children and those without, which is what you would have to do.
@Dragline -- see my quote and link above?

MrRich
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 11:37 am
Location: Reno, Nevada USA

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by MrRich »

Don't.

BeyondtheWrap
Posts: 598
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:38 pm
Location: NYC

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by BeyondtheWrap »

Just saw this in MMM's blog:
Mr. Money Mustache wrote:As a person who tries to put things into a logical perspective, kids are a tricky one. After all, it may seem somewhat illogical to voluntarily create a new being, and make such a big sacrifice to your own life to support it. Especially since there is no shortage of need in the world – why not help others instead of creating still more need?

On the other hand, if your goal of living is to understand what being a Human is all about, reproduction is pretty logical. It is the reason for all life on the planet, and it really the sole purpose of your existence from an evolutionary perspective. It would be hard to say you’ve had the full experience of humanity without experiencing this core part of it. Every cell in your body exists just to allow this to happen. That still doesn’t mean that you should have kids, it’s just an explanation for why it could be considered logical at some level.
http://www.mrmoneymustache.com/2014/09/ ... y-one-kid/

User avatar
Ego
Posts: 6358
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 12:42 am

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by Ego »

Mr. Money Mustache wrote:On the other hand, if your goal of living is to understand what being a Human is all about, reproduction is pretty logical. It is the reason for all life on the planet, and it really the sole purpose of your existence from an evolutionary perspective. It would be hard to say you’ve had the full experience of humanity without experiencing this core part of it. Every cell in your body exists just to allow this to happen. That still doesn’t mean that you should have kids, it’s just an explanation for why it could be considered logical at some level.
Is that logical or biological? I think he might be confusing biological meaning with actual human meaning. This idea is made plain when you ask yourself if those with two kids are enjoying less humanity that those with ten. From a genetic perspective, the purpose of genes it to make more genes. From a biological perspective, the purpose of each cell is to make more cells. Fortunately, consciousness provides humanity a perspective that is so much more than mere genes or cells.

RealPerson
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:33 pm

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by RealPerson »

@Ego: Even at a logical/biological level. Procreation serves the purpose of perpetuating the species by ensuring that sufficient individuals survive to maintain the existance of the species. However, humanity has been so successful at this that you could argue a reduction in our numbers may very well benefit the survival of humanity. Procreation at the present numbers undermines the survival of our species. Less procreation, such as one child per couple, instead of 2 or 3, may well be the answer to help us survive by reducing the need for resources to a sustainable level.

I like your reference to consciousness, i.e. humans have the frontal lobe to create meaning for their life beyond simply ensuring that there will be a next generation. Human vs. animal behavior.

7Wannabe5
Posts: 9369
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 9:03 am

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by 7Wannabe5 »

I think MMM was talking about "purpose" not "meaning." There is no denying that kids give you purpose (diapers do not change themselves) but whether or not having/raising kids is in true or good alignment with any given individual human's purpose is another matter. I never even considered not having kids because when I am asked the question "What would your job be if you lived in the Old West?", I automatically answer "I would run the library and/or the boarding house" and the part of me that sees myself making dinner for 20 people around the boarding house table was going to have kids but the part of me that wanted to read in peace stopped after having two. Of course, individual purpose doesn't necessarily align with kids or career. It's more fundamental yet flexible than that.

OTOH, the fact is that as little as 50 years ago (no time in human history) people could not choose to marry or have sex without also choosing to have children so how can there even be any deep developed philosophy on the question of this thread beyond "Marry or burn?" This is a bit off topic but one thing I am curious about is why people who do not want to have and/or raise children together and do not believe in "true love" or "soul mates" etc. (I am assuming this is true of most rationals) choose to marry? I also wonder about why single people choose to buy houses? I mean, I get wanting to stay single, independent and carefree (especially since that is where I am again with adult children) but why take on the commitment of a permanent pair-bond and/or the trouble of constructing a nest if you aren't going to lay a vulnerable egg or two?

Spartan_Warrior
Posts: 1659
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 1:24 am

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by Spartan_Warrior »

7Wannabe5 wrote:I also wonder about why single people choose to buy houses? I mean, I get wanting to stay single, independent and carefree (especially since that is where I am again with adult children) but why take on the commitment of a permanent pair-bond and/or the trouble of constructing a nest if you aren't going to lay a vulnerable egg or two?
Good question. I bought a house as a single person specifically to support a future family. That was a mistake, and I now know that buying isn't necessarily preferable to renting for me, and moreover I should only ever rent/buy as much house as I need right now, not in an unrealized future. I do wonder if I would have bought at all if marriage and a kid or two wasn't part of my eventual plan.

Little_empty_attic
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 8:21 pm

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by Little_empty_attic »

If you have siblings who have or are going to have kids, we've found it makes the decision not to have them easier. There was no family pressure on us since our younger siblings had the grandkids, we have the benefit of contact with the young but without ultimate responsibility, and we are everyone's backup guardians in case of accident. We've contributed to school tuition and weddings for all of the nieces and nephews, and they'll inherit a good chunk of change when we join the bleeding choir invisible.

steveo73
Posts: 1733
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2013 6:52 pm

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by steveo73 »

Look I read this and it comes down to me to the fact that personally I think the 3 kids that I have make my life really freaken great. Its not easy but who gives a shit about easy. Easy doesn't equate to happiness.

As for that chart - what a load of crap with completely made up statistics. I have friends that are struggling with their lives and relationships and I think that makes a greater difference to your happiness than having kids. In stating that I think having kids might make you happier.

I'll add that anyone who thinks that kids stop them having a full life for themselves has it all wrong. You don't have to give up your life to have kids. You have to give up some resources but to me that is not a big problem.

Little_empty_attic
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 8:21 pm

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by Little_empty_attic »

steveo73 wrote:Its not easy but who gives a shit about easy. Easy doesn't equate to happiness.
Easier wrt the pressure family or society may put on one to have children, that's all.

andystkilda
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 10:13 pm

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by andystkilda »

I'd say the simple fact that in my opinion, very very few people regret having children in the long run. Does this fact alone not prove it is a good decision for most?

akratic
Posts: 681
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:18 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by akratic »

Consider three aspects of happiness: pleasure, flow, and meaning. Having children trades pleasure for meaning. This is a compelling trade because pleasure is a lot easier to find than meaning.

jacob
Site Admin
Posts: 15906
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:38 pm
Location: USA, Zone 5b, Koppen Dfa, Elev. 620ft, Walkscore 77
Contact:

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by jacob »

andystkilda wrote:I'd say the simple fact that in my opinion, very very few people regret having children in the long run. Does this fact alone not prove it is a good decision for most?
No it doesn't :-P

You need to consider all combinations:

1) People who had children and regretted it.
2) People who had children and didn't regret it.
3) People who didn't have children and regretted it.
4) People who didn't have children and didn't regret it.

One should hope that (2) and (4) outweigh (1) and (3) respectively. The question is whether it does? If it doesn't the next question is the cost of making a mistake e.g. regret vs 18+ years of unhappy parenting. All on a sliding scale of course. Other aspects may apply too.

black_son_of_gray
Posts: 504
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 7:39 pm

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by black_son_of_gray »

Granted, it is coming from the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (so you know what their stance is), but this chart has a pretty thorough list of the reasons people give for wanting to have children (along with some slapdash psychoanalysis):
http://www.vhemt.org/whybreed.pdf

andystkilda
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 10:13 pm

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by andystkilda »

jacob wrote:
andystkilda wrote:I'd say the simple fact that in my opinion, very very few people regret having children in the long run. Does this fact alone not prove it is a good decision for most?
No it doesn't :-P

You need to consider all combinations:

1) People who had children and regretted it.
2) People who had children and didn't regret it.
3) People who didn't have children and regretted it.
4) People who didn't have children and didn't regret it.

One should hope that (2) and (4) outweigh (1) and (3) respectively. The question is whether it does? If it doesn't the next question is the cost of making a mistake e.g. regret vs 18+ years of unhappy parenting. All on a sliding scale of course. Other aspects may apply too.
I agree that you have to consider all of those categories, but doesn't category 2 have far more people in it, worldwide, than the others? - 80-90% of the world population. So by definition, if it is the largest category, it is the decision with the highest percentage chance of being the correct one, from a life-long perspective. No?

I agree that the likely cost to someone how may regret not having children would probably be less than someone who hates parenting but has no choice to continue on for 20 years!

User avatar
GandK
Posts: 2059
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:00 pm

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by GandK »

@andystkilda

I had children. Do I regret it globally? No. Do I regret certain parts of it? Hell yes. But the "would you do it again?" question is extremely loaded because if I say no, my kids would not exist.

So this is how it shakes out: I'm glad I had my kids. I love my kids. But if you told 20-year-old me about all the realities of having kids, 20-year-old me would have run away screaming. She would not have forged onward, determined to embrace the good things. I'm certain of it. So I think parents put on rose-colored glasses at times when they contemplate their own choices, because the alternative isn't good. Or healthy.

andystkilda
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 10:13 pm

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by andystkilda »

GandK wrote:@andystkilda

I had children. Do I regret it globally? No. Do I regret certain parts of it? Hell yes. But the "would you do it again?" question is extremely loaded because if I say no, my kids would not exist.

So this is how it shakes out: I'm glad I had my kids. I love my kids. But if you told 20-year-old me about all the realities of having kids, 20-year-old me would have run away screaming. She would not have forged onward, determined to embrace the good things. I'm certain of it. So I think parents put on rose-colored glasses at times when they contemplate their own choices, because the alternative isn't good. Or healthy.
Yes, I think you're right. It's probably an evolutionary trait in us that we put on those rose-coloured glasses and sign-up to having kids.

Dragline
Posts: 4436
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:50 am

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by Dragline »

andystkilda wrote:
jacob wrote:
andystkilda wrote:I'd say the simple fact that in my opinion, very very few people regret having children in the long run. Does this fact alone not prove it is a good decision for most?
No it doesn't :-P

You need to consider all combinations:

1) People who had children and regretted it.
2) People who had children and didn't regret it.
3) People who didn't have children and regretted it.
4) People who didn't have children and didn't regret it.

One should hope that (2) and (4) outweigh (1) and (3) respectively. The question is whether it does? If it doesn't the next question is the cost of making a mistake e.g. regret vs 18+ years of unhappy parenting. All on a sliding scale of course. Other aspects may apply too.
I agree that you have to consider all of those categories, but doesn't category 2 have far more people in it, worldwide, than the others? - 80-90% of the world population. So by definition, if it is the largest category, it is the decision with the highest percentage chance of being the correct one, from a life-long perspective. No?

I agree that the likely cost to someone how may regret not having children would probably be less than someone who hates parenting but has no choice to continue on for 20 years!
In developed societies, the trend appears to be a lot more people in the 3/4 category.

But I would suspect most people are in both categories 1 and 2, or 3 and 4, depending on what day or year in their life you ask them. I know an awful lot of men fathering babies around age 50 or later now, after having sworn off the idea earlier in life.

jacob
Site Admin
Posts: 15906
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:38 pm
Location: USA, Zone 5b, Koppen Dfa, Elev. 620ft, Walkscore 77
Contact:

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by jacob »

My 25 year old self already had a lot of indirect "parenting" experience.
+ My mother worked in daycare + we had an in-house daycare (2-5 y/o kids)
+ Younger sibling, several younger family relatives (I'm the oldest cousin on my mother's side).
+ I was in a four year relationship with someone who had two kids (preteen and teen years).
+ I never liked being a kid nor was/am I really interested in interacting with kids.

While most kids grow up to be nice people (technically average people---that's another factor, I risk not being able to relate to them), I must admit that I do and did not enjoy any of the parenting. Changing diapers. Getting them to do their homework. School events. Them setting their room on fire. Having the cops knock on the door. Not saying that's a given thing for all kids, but it seems to happen a lot more than people think (remember, I have a big sample space here). Of course there were/are good things too but to me a birthday party doesn't bring me the same joy as e.g. being on a boat fishing.

People say it's different "when it's your own" whatever that means. However, I suspect part of that is exactly to resolve a potential but strong cognitive dissonance. In any case, I've made a deliberate and I believe informed choice based on my knowledge of parenting and how I personally (dis)like that obligation and decided that I don't want this 20+ year commitment. Even as much as it probably would be nice to have kids --- as long as they've moved out already. Even then ... I also know that being estranged from your kids or relatives happen more often than people care to admit.

OTOH, I think that anyone who has always fantasized/thought of being a parent, enjoyed parenting when experienced it, likes kids ... should definitely consider having kids.

Chad
Posts: 3844
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:10 pm

Re: Convince me that I should have children.

Post by Chad »

andystkilda wrote:I'd say the simple fact that in my opinion, very very few people regret having children in the long run. Does this fact alone not prove it is a good decision for most?
How many 40-60 year olds are going to admit that 20-40 years of there lives was miserable?.....none. Plus, it's almost impossible to understand how you feel from every part that sucks and is "worth it" from having kids. I'm not suggesting that most regret it, but the idea that almost all are glad they did seems too extravagant.

Post Reply