CPI vs. "Real" Inflation vs. Gold

Ask your investment, budget, and other money related questions here
ThisDinosaur
Posts: 315
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2015 9:31 am

Re: CPI vs. "Real" Inflation vs. Gold

Post by ThisDinosaur » Sun Apr 16, 2017 3:37 am

Well one lesson I remember from that book (4 pillars) was that the best investments are usually the least popular, and that diversified risk is *always* associated with higher return. So, the relevant question is whether gold is currently seen as a "safety" bet or a "risky" bet by the population at large. My impression is that its a very popular asset right now.

Early in 4 pillars he mentions that an oz of gold could buy you a nice suit in Dante's time, and ever since. Well, google tells me right now an oz of gold is a little over $1,290 and a men's business suit is somewhere around $400. How much did a suit cost the day Nixon took office? About $30. An oz of gold? $40. (Can anyone who was around then confirm those numbers?)

OTOH, where are all the unpopular assets? I've already got lots of foreign and emerging market stock. The least popular asset I can think of is long term US bonds. Those have lots of credit risk and low expected return (basically just the yield). Buying LTTs without counterbalancing with gold is essentially a bet that deflation and low-to-negative interest rates will dominate the future, yes?

BRUTE, I agree with everything you said. And yes, I am over optimizing. But asking these questions will hopefully help me figure out WTF is going on. (Off topic: which Austrian economics book was it that gave you the warm fuzzies?)

User avatar
BRUTE
Posts: 2002
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 5:20 pm

Re: CPI vs. "Real" Inflation vs. Gold

Post by BRUTE » Sun Apr 16, 2017 10:11 am

ThisDinosaur wrote:
Sun Apr 16, 2017 3:37 am
which Austrian economics book was it that gave you the warm fuzzies?
Human Action by Ludwig von Mises. also good: Man, Economy, And State by Murray Rothbard. Rothbard got kicked out by Ayn Rand for being too Libertarian. for a different train of thought leading to similar ideas (except re central banking), anything by Milton or David Friedman.

User avatar
Dragline
Posts: 4114
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:50 am

Re: CPI vs. "Real" Inflation vs. Gold

Post by Dragline » Sun Apr 16, 2017 10:18 am

ThisDinosaur wrote:
Sun Apr 16, 2017 3:37 am

OTOH, where are all the unpopular assets? I've already got lots of foreign and emerging market stock. The least popular asset I can think of is long term US bonds. Those have lots of credit risk and low expected return (basically just the yield). Buying LTTs without counterbalancing with gold is essentially a bet that deflation and low-to-negative interest rates will dominate the future, yes?
If you are looking for "the most hated" asset at a particular time, go find interviews of Jim Rogers, whose whole theory of investing revolves around accumulating such things until they become popular again and then selling them. But note that he recognizes that his timing is often poor and his investments can take years to play out.

Right now he is recommending Russia, oil, agricultural commodities and places like Kazahkstan and North Korea, although he admits that he has not found any way to invest in North Korea at this time. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXyuUN9rCwk and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZM9bokmUr0w

I tend to look at these things on their 52-week ranges. Oil (XLE, XOM) is definitely in the lower quartile. LTT are down there, but have recently made gains. Some REITS are down (healthcare, some commercial property).

User avatar
Riggerjack
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 3:09 am

Re: CPI vs. "Real" Inflation vs. Gold

Post by Riggerjack » Sun Apr 16, 2017 12:58 pm

where are all the unpopular assets
As I said above. Agricultural commodities that just had bumper crops and companies with insane amounts of debt, and losses, and projected dividend cuts. IE, JJG and FTR.

In this environment, about the only unpopular assets are extremely risky assets. Now, once you accept this, think of how "safe" the standard assets are currently.

Then start looking around for a bet you are comfortable making. Or put your cash under your matress. Now is the time to get used to risk. If you don't, this agonizing you are doing over what is "best", will be with you until you do.

If it helps, I think if it as points. I buy 401k points, and real estate points. When I have enough points, I can retire. In the end, it is all just points.
is Riggerjack investing the entirety of his FIRE money at this particular point in time
I have real estate that I am keeping, some I am preparing to sell, and my 401k. The 401k is usually fully invested. Currently, I have some in cash accounts, and some in index funds, and some in JJG and FTR. Which is functioning as a long term short of the indexes I would normally be investing in.

But for some reason, when I test for risk tolerance, I test off the charts. So, please factor that in, when looking at my choices. ( I think this is a side effect of watching " Rudy" too many times. Eventually the underdog will rule! Right?)

@ this dinosaur: In the end, it is only points. Fear is only relevant to real life. As you get older, and see that your choices to optimize X resulted in less optimal results for Y, and in the end Y was more important than you realized, you will start to understand that optimal is still not ideal.

You are buying experience, the sooner you start buying it, the less it will cost, since your pool of points is smaller. But find something you are comfortable with. Do that before it loses half its value, so you can stick with your strategy, rather than lock in your loss by selling low.

ThisDinosaur
Posts: 315
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2015 9:31 am

Re: CPI vs. "Real" Inflation vs. Gold

Post by ThisDinosaur » Fri Apr 21, 2017 12:42 pm

Ludwig von Mises wrote:A tendency prevails to make a sharp distinction between such purely
speculative ventures and genuinely sound investment. The distinction
is one of degree only. There is no such thing as a nonspeculative
investment. In a changing economy action always involves speculation.
Investments may be good or bad, but they are always speculative.
A radical change in conditions may render bad even investments
commonly considered perfectly safe.
https://mises.org/sites/default/files/H ... tion_3.pdf
A convergence of the point Brute has been making with the point I have been making. So, so I'll rephrase this way:
Is gold's diversifying role in a portfolio Dependent or Independent from its trajectory after the time of purchase?
IOW, what evidence is there that a portfolio with a large allocation to gold can outperform a similar portfolio without it *under the condition that the gold is over priced at the time of purchase*.
Dragline wrote:Right now he is recommending Russia, oil, agricultural commodities and places like Kazahkstan and North Korea
Jim Rogers. Perfect. It's comforting to find successful authorities to confirm what I'm already thinking.
Riggerjack wrote:In this environment, about the only unpopular assets are extremely risky assets. Now, once you accept this, think of how "safe" the standard assets are currently.
That's pretty much what Bernstein would say, I think.

User avatar
BRUTE
Posts: 2002
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 5:20 pm

Re: CPI vs. "Real" Inflation vs. Gold

Post by BRUTE » Fri Apr 21, 2017 5:45 pm

it seems intuitive that a portfolio with a large part invested in gold, bought at a high price, wound perform worse than the same portfolio with the gold part invested in another asset, given that the other asset performed better than gold during the same period. gold is only good to balance portfolios if it counters the fall in the other asset classes better than what it substitutes for.

Post Reply