ERE in Non-Monetary System
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 6:50 am
Trying to somehow integrate my spreadsheets into my systems diagram has perhaps turned me into a hamster stuck on a reinventing-the-wheel wheel, but...
I own myself. Myself is a productive asset for me. I may appreciate or depreciate, at the margin as an asset depending on maintenance/improvement decisions and practices. Eventually I will depreciate to worm-food.
I can lease Myself out to others in exchange for money ($) in units of 7WB5 X Hours. I must spend some of my 7WB5-Hours maintaining Myself. I can spend some of my 7WB5-Hours improving myself and/or improving and maintaining other assets I currently hold or to which I currently have access.
In simple model of ERE, if I lease Myself to other(s) for $X per year and I spend $X/10 per year on maintenance of Myself and Y (7WB5-Hours) on maintenance of Myself, then after leasing Myself out for 10 years, I will have accumulated enough $ to maintain Myself for 90 years assuming continued practice and maintained value of input of Y (7WB5-Hours) towards maintenance of Myself (and non-avoidable eventual complete depreciation of Myself) and constant maintained value of unit $ on market.
Obviously, Bare Maintenance of Myself or Savings is an overly simplistic decision fork for Flow of Cash $ from Flow of My Life Energy towards Lease to Other(s.) Four asset classes that could be integrated in the stead of Savings would be Productive Appreciating, Non-Productive Appreciating, Productive Depreciating, and Non-Productive Depreciating. Making decisions in alignment with directing Flow of Cash $ towards Productive Appreciating Assets will obviously most likely optimize efficient maximization of Total Value Assets Held.
Anyways, if you get to this point and then you start trying to integrate the Z(7WB5-Hours) spent hauling wood-chips to a vacant lot in order to build up soil in which to plant asparagus, you might start wondering about how much (what ratio) of Life Energy Hours you would have to cause to flow towards the creation of Productive Appreciating Assets and/or other Asset Classes in order to achieve ERE in a non-monetary system (one in which there was no possibility of getting a job.) Would the math still work out just about the same?
I own myself. Myself is a productive asset for me. I may appreciate or depreciate, at the margin as an asset depending on maintenance/improvement decisions and practices. Eventually I will depreciate to worm-food.
I can lease Myself out to others in exchange for money ($) in units of 7WB5 X Hours. I must spend some of my 7WB5-Hours maintaining Myself. I can spend some of my 7WB5-Hours improving myself and/or improving and maintaining other assets I currently hold or to which I currently have access.
In simple model of ERE, if I lease Myself to other(s) for $X per year and I spend $X/10 per year on maintenance of Myself and Y (7WB5-Hours) on maintenance of Myself, then after leasing Myself out for 10 years, I will have accumulated enough $ to maintain Myself for 90 years assuming continued practice and maintained value of input of Y (7WB5-Hours) towards maintenance of Myself (and non-avoidable eventual complete depreciation of Myself) and constant maintained value of unit $ on market.
Obviously, Bare Maintenance of Myself or Savings is an overly simplistic decision fork for Flow of Cash $ from Flow of My Life Energy towards Lease to Other(s.) Four asset classes that could be integrated in the stead of Savings would be Productive Appreciating, Non-Productive Appreciating, Productive Depreciating, and Non-Productive Depreciating. Making decisions in alignment with directing Flow of Cash $ towards Productive Appreciating Assets will obviously most likely optimize efficient maximization of Total Value Assets Held.
Anyways, if you get to this point and then you start trying to integrate the Z(7WB5-Hours) spent hauling wood-chips to a vacant lot in order to build up soil in which to plant asparagus, you might start wondering about how much (what ratio) of Life Energy Hours you would have to cause to flow towards the creation of Productive Appreciating Assets and/or other Asset Classes in order to achieve ERE in a non-monetary system (one in which there was no possibility of getting a job.) Would the math still work out just about the same?