lol- I think it does have something to do with sugar metabolism. It's a very complex, not very well-researched topic as of yet, but I do think it will prove to be a very important matter in the realm of medical guidelines for individualized nutrition in the future. Human breast-milk is sweeter than the breast-milk of other mammals because our big brains demand more energy for growth and operation, and sugar is what the brain runs on. Some adult humans can eat more sugary foods and store the calories as fat on their backsides in order to provide nutrition for growing fetus. When human females are either apple shaped or very stick shaped, they tend towards having problems with fertility. Humans who are pear or hour-glass shaped tend towards having problems if they don't allow themselves to be fertile. IOW, just like female rabbits, if curvy women don't have babies or breast-feed, they have a greater tendency towards developing estrogenic cancers. This is an example of how statistics can be misleading. The tendency towards cancer is correlated with the natural tendency to have a more curvy figure, but it isn't the more curvy figure that is causing the cancer. If you consider weight vs. medical costs, it might look like being heavier is causing both more heart attacks in modern men and more breast cancer in modern women, but the causal mechanisms are quite possibly completely different. The fat you are carrying on your breasts and hips only correlates with cancer risk to the extent that you never used your curvy body for the intention it was made. Choosing not to have or breast-feed any more babies past the age of 26 did somewhat increase my risk, but we can't make medical decisions in an economic vacuum.One funny, not so well-known, thing about hormones, is that women who have the relatively rare Barbie-like figure with very narrow hips and very large breasts are exhibiting a high-testosterone syndrome. That's why I wasn't surprised when a fit-looking, tennis playing, famous actress with large breasts was found to have a good deal of visceral fat during the course of the BBC documentary I linked.BRUTE said: female parental unit was juicing
@jennypenny: I agree that it is highly annoying to have to prove yourself to be the exception to the rule of any population statistic. Waist-to-hip ratio can be somewhat dismissed by a very thin, athletic type for the same/opposite reason that BMI can be somewhat dismissed by a hip-heavy female or a shoulder heavy man. The rational thing to do is to look at several other related risk factors and see if they apply to you. For instance, my blood pressure and resting pulse are quite low and my sugar metabolism is normal. I can't run a marathon or do a pull-up, but I can hike all the day long with a papoose-weight backpack, and I can put my feet all the way behind my head on to the floor, and then roll forward and jump up to standing. I was exercising with a very fit, slender 75 year old man the other day, and he said "Stop, stop, you aren't 12." when I kept doing that, but I think that was just sour grapes.