Early Retirement Extreme Forums » ERE Book/Blog/Forum

Chapter 7 graphs and equations

(4 posts)
  1. damianow

    Novice
    Joined: Oct '11
    Posts: 3

    For anyone that has a copy of the book around, if you could follow me:

    Figure 7.12 is equation 7.10 graphed (N as a function of P0)
    Figure 7.13 is equation 7.15 graphed (M as a function of r)

    But what equation represents figure 7.14? It is also M as a function of r. I don't understand what variable is replaced in equation 7.15 to get to this graph, and how you incorporate equation 7.16. I am an engineer graduate, and a few friends of mine sat around and tried to figure this out. Both figures 7.13 and 7.14 are different, but are graphing the same parameters.

    Does it have to do with P0? P0 should represent the size of the fund at the end of the period worked such that it should last until the end of your life (or N+M=80). Should I replace P0 in equation 7.15 with N in equation 7.10? How does the constraint equation 7.16 get used?

    Someone please help because this is driving me nuts.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  2. jacob

    Expert
    Joined: Jul '10
    Posts: 3,376

    Fig 7.14 is eqs 7.10 and 7.15 with the constraint of 7.16. This is one equation (just "7.10"+"7.15"=80) with one parameter, i, one independent, r, and one unknown P0/p which must be solved for. Once you have P0/p, you insert it back into 7.15 which gives you M. Then you have your plot.

    I found P0/p numerically.

    The difference between figs 7.13 and 7.14 is that fig 7.13 assumes P0/p=30 for all values. This constraint is replaced by 80=N+M in fig 7.14.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  3. damianow

    Novice
    Joined: Oct '11
    Posts: 3

    I used Goal Seek in Excel to manipulate 80=(eq 7.10)+(eq 7.15) to determine a P0/p for any given r and i. I plugged in this P0/p back into equation 7.15 to determine M. For validation, I plugged the same P0/p back into 7.10 to determine N. What I should find is that N and M at this point should still add up to 80, but it did not.

    Given r=0.4, i=0.1, and N+M=80; P0/p = 10.9, M = 10.2 and N = 50.1. Please advise. Thanks Jacob!

    Posted 1 year ago #
  4. damianow

    Novice
    Joined: Oct '11
    Posts: 3

    Ignore last post, I figured it out. Thanks a lot Jacob!

    Posted 1 year ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.